OL, RB, Secondary or other for the first round?

I choose RB

i too choose rb....esp cuz in the first rd there will be 3 top guys....slaton. mcfadden, rice...anyone of those will be great!!!

i said OL, cuz unless slaton is available i wouldnt even waste my pick. the o line is still youre weakest area IMO.

unkie1283 wrote:i said OL, cuz unless slaton is available i wouldnt even waste my pick. the o line is still youre weakest area IMO.

i agree that ou roline sucks but we have so many young guys not getting a chance that id rather have a great rb in the first to come in here and help out our team...JMO but we need to start the rookies and see what they got

amazingandre wrote:

unkie1283 wrote:i said OL, cuz unless slaton is available i wouldnt even waste my pick. the o line is still youre weakest area IMO.

i agree that ou roline sucks but we have so many young guys not getting a chance that id rather have a great rb in the first to come in here and help out our team...JMO but we need to start the rookies and see what they got

absolutely. i have always been a big fan of starting the first round rookie to help him develop unless you have someone like LT or Steve Smith starting ahead of them.

I don't know what to vote. We need all 3 of those positions filled with a first pick. lol

actually they way our secondary played without d rob makes me happy....when him and bennett are out there with hutchins and demps dep ill be sooo happy